Mohammad Nadeem Khan
Sri Aurobindo University, India
Title: Associated with clinical pharmacological research that types of clinical research & trial Factor and choice of Investigator
Biography
Biography: Mohammad Nadeem Khan
Abstract
Meeting the objectives of investigations with investigated and medicinal product (Drugs) and the speed with which this is done, are influenced in a major way by the independent physician /clinicians undertaking the work . Hence it is worth spreading time and trouble to choose investigator with care. The nature of the proposed study, will largely decide the professional and scientifically qualification and the patient and facilities required from the investigator. Personal attributes are most important requirements for workers in drug trials or drug development. This may be decisive in choosing the particular doctor from a number similarly qualified scientifically. In many ways they are most important. Departure from the ideal in other respects can often be made good, but nothing can make up for serious deficiencies in personal qualities. It is worth considering in more detail some of the general advantages and disadvantages for drug research in the different types of centers available of co-operation like research and academic units, other department in teaching hospitals , non-teaching hospitals , community heath and other special centers and general practitioner . There are many sharing points to the choice of particular investigator. he may will know by publications and repute for previous work either with the some type of drug or in a special field of medicine or he may have worked with the company previously or drug trials, occasionally he may approach the company to undertake studies and this forms a particularly favorable prognostic sign. He may be known socially and provincially .All of these diverse origins may be useful start to a relationship. Having satisfied scientifically and proficiently requirements are must look closely to personal factors. The personal nature of clinical investigator especially in relation to the company investigator’s own personality should be explored for the two will work closely together. A productively relationship is more likely when it is a harmonious one. This mutual personal relationship is the key to successful trials and may lead one to work repeatedly on trials with the some investigator integrity, motivation, and reliability