Meet Inspiring Speakers and Experts at our 3000+ Global Conference Series Events with over 1000+ Conferences, 1000+ Symposiums
and 1000+ Workshops on Medical, Pharma, Engineering, Science, Technology and Business.

Explore and learn more about Conference Series : World's leading Event Organizer

Back

Mohammad Nadeem Khan

Mohammad Nadeem Khan

Sri Aurobindo University, India

Title: Associated with clinical pharmacological research that types of clinical research & trial Factor and choice of Investigator

Biography

Biography: Mohammad Nadeem Khan

Abstract

Meeting the objectives of investigations  with  investigated and medicinal product (Drugs) and the speed with which this is done, are influenced in a major  way by the independent physician /clinicians undertaking the work .  Hence it is worth spreading time and trouble to choose investigator with care. The nature of the proposed study, will largely decide the professional and scientifically qualification and the patient and facilities required from the investigator.  Personal attributes are most important requirements for workers in drug trials or drug development. This may be decisive in choosing the particular doctor from a number similarly qualified scientifically. In many ways they are most important. Departure from the ideal in other respects can often be made good, but nothing can make up for serious deficiencies in personal qualities.  It is worth considering  in more  detail some of the  general advantages and disadvantages for drug research in the different  types of  centers available  of  co-operation  like research and academic  units, other department  in teaching hospitals , non-teaching hospitals , community heath and other  special  centers and general practitioner . There are many sharing points to the choice of particular investigator. he may will know  by publications and repute for previous  work  either with  the some type of drug  or in a special field of medicine or he may have worked with the company previously  or drug trials, occasionally he may approach the company to undertake studies and this forms a particularly  favorable  prognostic sign. He may be known socially and provincially .All of these diverse origins may be useful start to a relationship. Having satisfied scientifically and proficiently requirements are must look closely to personal factors. The personal nature of clinical investigator especially in relation to the company investigator’s own personality should be explored for the two will work closely together. A productively relationship is more likely when it is a harmonious one.  This mutual personal relationship is the key to successful trials and may lead one to work repeatedly on trials with the some investigator integrity, motivation, and reliability